Square O

i found this thing while i was stumbling across the net. for all you puzzle addicts

Sexual Fantasies

I think every generation has its iconic sexual fantasies that every guy wants to recreate. By sexual fantasies I mean the dressing up and role playing part. Obviously everyone’s sex goddess is Jenna Jameson, but here I’m talking bout movie, video game heroines. Our parents (between the ages of 40 – 60) had Princess Leia (right spelling?) from Star Wars. We, on the other hand, staying true to our information, connected age seem to be obsessed with Lara Croft from the Tomb Raider series. And ofcourse, putting Angelina Jolie as Lara Croft definitely helped to instil Lady Croft as a favourite among us perverted nymphomaniacs. And even though Angelina Jolie is on the medium side of things, upper body wise, the padded bra in Tomb Raider the movie (the first one) definitely helped put things into perspective. And hey, lets be straight. Who the hell doesn’t want to sleep with Angelina Jolie?! Every bloody person I know wants to. I say person because I know a few women also who’d like to sleep with her. :D

Ok…. Let me be honest here. There is only one guy I know who doesn’t find her attractive. And even though I have no doubts of his orientation, I can’t help but wonder…. HOW?! How can he not find her attractive? I guess, to each his own, right?

Another favourite seems to Selena from Underworld. And who can blame them? Kate Beckinsale’s hot! The full body leather skin tight suit definitely helps. :D this I guess would be some sort of vampire fetish. But if we’re lookin at vampires, then I’d definitely prefer Kristanna Loken from Bloodrayne.

An all time fantasy among all generations seems to be nurses and maids. Hot ones of course. What’s with that?

What do fantasies represent anyways? Is it the subconscious mind’s way of saying that the person you’re with is not good enough or that he / she can and should be something more and better? Or is it something else like escaping reality, being someone else or something like that? Is it that we are not happy with our life and who we are? Is it some sort of a mild drug?

What’s your fantasy?

I Think

I think I over analyze and over think things.

I bet my girl friend's going to be laughing her head off when she reads this.

Kiss? What is a Kiss?

You know how your relationship just kinda gets boring? The kisses don’t hold the same appeal? Well that had happened to me some time ago. The kisses in my relationship some how didn’t hold the same appeal….. they just kinda got……. Boring…….

Without going into personal details, lemme just say that my girlfriend and I discussed it and we both felt the same. I decided that I’m not gonna give up without a fight. Next time, I resolved to make it memorable. So, I tried a few things, and anyways, now things are pretty much perfect. That got me thinking, what constitutes a kiss?

Is a kiss just a mish mash, jumble, dueling of tongues, teeth, lips and saliva? I know it sounds gross, but hey, that’s what it basically is right? (I love kissing btw). And since I love kissing, I’m kinda inclined to think that it’s much more than that. Anyways, back to the basic deed. When you kiss (and I’m talking only from a guy’s point of view here. I don’t even want to consider looking at it from a girl’s point of view. Things are just too weird in a girl’s head).

Anyways, when you kiss, is only using your mouth good enough? Is that all what a kiss is supposed to be? From my experience, only using your mouth (and i'm talking about the mouth as a whole with everything it has) doesn’t do it. I’m guessing that no matter how good a kisser you are, the kiss by itself doesn’t have the same spark it used to after some time.

Is it like a drug that the body gets used to and fails to respond to? Do you need higher doses or better stuff to make you feel that familiar, amazing tingling? (Hey! That’s what some women have told me……. Tingling…… Interesting word isn’t it….. Wonder how it feels…… :D…….. Just kidding….. :D )

Anyways, so, in order to get that ‘higher dose’, does one need to do better things? More things? Like maybe use your hands on different part of the woman’s body? And if you do use your hands, can you consider it a part of kissing? Is that a kiss? Because, well, you aren’t using just you mouth. And then, because of this, are you slowly progressing to foreplay? (I know that kissing is a part of foreplay, but I’m talking about only kissing under the circumstances that you don’t want to or can’t go any further than kissing.)

Also, is a kiss a yardstick or a measurement of how your relationship is? Is it an ECG (the test that tell you whether your heart is fine or not in medical terms) of the relationship?

“I’m sorry sir, the ECG of your relationship came out. It’s bad news. Based on your kiss, you relationship is deteriorating. Soon, it will be dead.” ------ You might not get that. You'll have be my head to actually understand that. (Now I feel like Dr. John Dorian, also known as J.D. from Scrubs.)

(I think I watch too much T.V.)

I mean, how do you know whether or not your relationship is working? If someone or something had to tell you that your relationship's going to last would you listen to them? Similarly, is the kiss a benchmark or a measurement of your relationship? Is the kiss the thing that tells you "Your relationship is perfect! Don't worry.......!"

I felt like Carrie from Sex and the City while writing this blog :D

A Male version, of course.

(I definitely watch TOO much T.V.)

Re: Love

Let me just clarify my stand...... after reading my blog on love, some might think that i'm against the entire concept of love or atleast against the word love...... let me just say that this isn't so. I'm not against love or the word love. I'm only against the entire way that the word "Love" is being used nowadays. The way most people use the word, just demeans the entire concept. They use it casually, off handedly, and kinda like an off the shoulder kinda way.

Now, i'm not saying that i know what love is. But i'd like to believe that it is much more than what people think it is. To me, it just seems kinda shallow. This might seem like a contradiction to what i posted earlier, but let me assure you, those were thoughts. These are opinions. Get the difference?

Anyways, suppose you're with a girl for sometime, you kiss her, make out with her, and then you end up saying that you love her. Is that what love is? A consolation prize so that the girl doesn't feel used? That's just wrong! (In all respects) (Pardon my usage of words. I'm been watching too much of 'That 70's Show' and might sound like Kelso) :D

Anyways, Back to the point. Is that what love is?

I sincerely hope not.

Flaw in the Matrix series

This post is just to get it out there that there is a small, but very crucial flaw in the entire matrix series. But, this in no way diminishes the greatness of the series.

Most people know that there is the Matrix, Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions. But there is also another bunch of animated movies called the Animatrix. This is a compilation of quite a few short stories that give us a background of the matrix series and also fills in the gaps of the three movies.

In the Animatrix, there is one small but cruicial line that voids the entire Matrix series. Due to this line, the matrix shouldn’t even exist.

In the movie The Second Renaissance, Part 2, the humans are at war with the machines. The humans try everything. They even drop nuclear weapons. But nothing seems to affect them. The narrator says that the machines survive because they can stand the heat of the bombs.

But that’s not all there is to nuclear weapons. Is there?

In the Matrix, the machines can supposedly be stopped with EMP (electro magnetic pulse) weapons. BUT! When and how was EMP discovered?! EMP was discovered during the first nuclear bomb test, called the Trinity tests. Every nuclear bomb gives off a powerful EMP! Each and every one!!!!

SO, How did the machines survive the onslaught?

Technically the Matrix should never have existed and the machines should have been destroyed! See the logic?

Truth

Morpheus in the Matrix said “What is real? How do you define real?” that is the question that I want to ask today. With a little bit of a tweak of course. I want to ask “What is truth? How do you define truth?” Morpheus’s answer to Neo was that reality is just tiny electrical signals that are interpreted by the brain. My answer, or rather, my question is that, is truth just another electrical signal in the brain? Is truth relative? Does it depend on each person’s view and outlook to life? Due to this is, can truth be manipulated to suit our own personal and private agenda?

My friend (who I will be mentioning more in later blogs) and I used to have long talk over bottles of coke, talking about truth, life, and pretty much everything else. For us, truth is relative. What might be true to you might not be true for me. A few definitions of truth that I have seen are that

1. a generally accepted fact (in this case I would like to term it as a generally accepted notion)
2. the true or actual state of the matter
3. agreement with a standard

I mean, is that what truth is? Is it just a notion that everyone has accepted? Just because everyone has accepted it, does it mean it’s true?

What is the truth for you?